To A New Paradigm With FPB

FPB 64 Vs Reef – Are The Factors Of Safety Sufficient?

“Having a boat that can deal with whatever might happen—no matter what—provides a mental comfort level that defines their view of happy sailing.”
–Bill Parlatore, Passagemaker Magazine

Iron LAdy Reef Meeting 103

The various rules to which yachts are built are based on seagoing loads. If you design to ABS or Lloyd’s, odds are you will be OK  offshore, but there is little extra margin for the mistakes which are a part  of cruising. With an ABS keel structure, if you go aground, it is almost certain a trip to the boat yard is in your immediate future. But if you engineer to four times ABS, you are probably going to continue with your cruising.

We have tested these these theories ourselves, and had our owners repeatedly test them on our sailing designs. Now we have some real world verification of the FPB 64′s factors of safety.

The photos which follow were taken of one of the FPB 64s after it tangled with a reef in the Fiji Islands. She has been hauled to replace a damaged stabilizer fin. At the end of this post is a link to the details of the event which has some excellent lessons for us all.

Pete Rossin, Iron Lady’s skipper, told us “We dragged along the reef for close to 2 hours although more intermittently as time went on. The first hour was horrible. Tide was coming in – we hit the reef about an hour or so after low. My analysis is that we JUST clipped the outer reef edge with the bow on the stbd side as we were trying to exit to deeper water – another few meters off to to port and we would have been fine.  The wind then blew us around on to the outer side of the reef and pinned us but also blew us along the reef.  There were deeper stretches in between the heads and that is why we drifted and bumped slowly along the reef until we made deeper water…”

Read Pete’s full account by clicking here.

 

Iron LAdy Reef Meeting 102

There is superficial paint damage forward which coincides with a water depth of about 3.5′ (1.05m). The damage is mainly in this area and  all the way aft, indicating coral head tops with deeper water between.

Iron LAdy Reef Meeting 107

This is the leading edge of the prop skeg, here about the same depth as the forward abraided paint area.

Iron LAdy Reef Meeting 100

The abrasion on rudder tip and skeg bottom show the same water depth as is found forward.

Iron LAdy Reef Meeting 100 3

The rudder probably cut into the coral on impact. We have used a factor of twice ABS on our rudders for many years. This is an indicator twice ABS is on target.

Iron LAdy Reef Meeting 100 2

The fact that the prop coating is mainly intact tells us the skeg is doing its job.

Several factors helped to mitigate the damage incurred and the time spent on the reef:

  • Shallow draft reduces the amount of sea bottom (or coral) in contact with the hull and appendages. Even a foot/30cm more draft and the ability to float free would have been severely curtailed.
  • The rounded canoe body (hull) of the FPB type yacht skids easily on the bottom and does not dig itself in as is the case with hulls that have chines or harder edges.
  • The fact that the lee stabilizer fin broke free should be considered a benefit in that it could not anchor the boat in place.
  • Becoming trapped on a rising tide, rather than the reverse, was good luck. Whereas the crew of Iron Lady had the luxury of waiting, has they hit on a falling tide fast action to free themselves would have been advised. As an aside, knowing the state of the tide when on soundings, is always good practice.
  • A structurally sound full depth skeg ahead of and below the propeller protected the prop from damage.
  • Although not a factor here, the double bottom, water tight bulkheads, and oversized drive line components allow a range of tactics to save the boat that would not otherwise be available.

(For more information on cruising in coral, and getting out of situations like this, see  Practical Seamanship.)

If you are going to spend extended periods cruising, incidents like this will occur. Not often mind you, but like handling severe weather, it is better to be prepared for the worst, rather than just hoping for the best. Although we cannot foresee all eventualities, nor protect ourselves from everything, we like knowing that we have a design under us which will mitigate the results of operator error, the capriciousness of Mother Nature, or just plain bad luck.

For more information on the FPB Series, e-mail ToddR@SetSail.com


Posted by Steve Dashew  (September 9, 2011)




6 Responses to “FPB 64 Vs Reef – Are The Factors Of Safety Sufficient?”

  1. Scott Evangelista Says:
    Steve from these pictures it looks like mostly paint damage. Hard to gauge the depth of the scratches, but they certainly don’t look bad. Do you know if there is any metal work to do? Scott

    [Reply]

    Steve Dashew Reply:

    Hi Scott: As far as we know, no metal work, just paint. But Circa will give her a thorough vetting just to be sure.

    [Reply]


  2. JohnSpille Says:
    Steve, What prop coating are you using? How effective is it over time? John

    [Reply]

    Steve Dashew Reply:

    Hi John: We have tested two different systems. If you search the website for what we have now on WInd Horse, Prop Shield, you will find several references. The product used in New Zealand is called Prop Speed. Both work for a year or more. Exact comparisons are hard, but properly applied we prefer Prop Speed.

    [Reply]


  3. Bruce Says:
    Steve, Linda, you are seriously setting the standard by which all offshore yachts should be built. I have followed your travels, with envy, for years now and I knew you had a great boat when you put your own FPB in the water, but wow, what a testament to your great designs. Thanks for all the great ideas we can all put to practice with our own little ships. Bruce

    [Reply]

    Steve Dashew Reply:

    Thanks for the kind words, Bruce: Kudos should be spread equally with Todd Rickard, who oversees things with Circa, and Bruce Farrand and his team at Circa.

    [Reply]



Comments or Questions?