{"id":1292,"date":"1999-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-11-30T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/?p=1292"},"modified":"2015-10-16T12:11:52","modified_gmt":"2015-10-16T17:11:52","slug":"columbia-50","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/columbia-50\/","title":{"rendered":"Columbia 50"},"content":{"rendered":"
I believe your first cruising boat (Intermezzo) was a Columbia 50? Knowing this boat a little, what were the traits about it that you really liked, and really disliked? Thanks for your reply, <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
Hi Norm: There’s a bunch of data on this design in our Offshore Cruising Ency. Briefly, in its day, it was a good boat in light airs, awful uphill against any sort of sea, and quite reasonably priced for the end product. Also, if you like the “CCA” look, they are a pretty boat. But those long overhangs and unbalanced hull form (when heeled) make the boat a bit difficult to steer. It took the full efforts of our Aries wind vane to keep intermezzo on track in a breeze–but the Aries did the job. Note that Intermezzo had a deeper keel, more lead, a taller rig, and a much bigger rudder than the stock designs. Steve <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"