{"id":1337,"date":"1999-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-11-30T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/?p=1337"},"modified":"2015-10-16T12:09:29","modified_gmt":"2015-10-16T17:09:29","slug":"swept-back-spreaders-and-baby-stays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/swept-back-spreaders-and-baby-stays\/","title":{"rendered":"Swept Back Spreaders and Baby Stays"},"content":{"rendered":"
Dear Steve, We have been following your commentary for years now and have a question that we hope you can help with.<\/p>\n
Do you feel that a baby stay on the ketch rigged Sundeer 64’s would aid in preventing a mast inversion due to operator error? What conditions would create a circumstance where you could lose the spar? <\/p>\n
I am referring to page 662 of Offshore Cruising Encyclopedia, regarding your discussion of swept back spreaders. Is this setup less forgiving than a conventional spreader configuration with forward shrouds?<\/p>\n
Any comment would be appreciated. Thanks, Wayne <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
Hi Wayne: Swept spreaders, such as used on the Sundeer 64 ketches, push the mast forward. As such, they take the place of a forward lower shroud or baby stay. Since there is always a forward component to the thrust, the other shrouds would not be doing any work.<\/p>\n
We would recommend a cutter stay, for use with heavy weather sails. Regards – Steve<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"