{"id":1390,"date":"1999-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-11-30T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/?p=1390"},"modified":"2015-10-16T12:14:32","modified_gmt":"2015-10-16T17:14:32","slug":"furling-mains","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/furling-mains\/","title":{"rendered":"Furling Mains"},"content":{"rendered":"
I am currently looking at a 54 Hylas to be used for coastal cruising in Florida and the Bahamas, very little extended blue water. A lot of daysailing. Would you recommend a furling boom or in-mast (vertical battens)? Are the in-boom furlers relatively trouble-free? Thank you. Richard <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
Hi Richard: In-the-masts furlers are considered easier to use than in-boom, which require close monitoring of boom angles when furling and unfurling. Neither system is trouble-free. In-the-boom is much more efficient, with a much lower center of gravity and less windage. But honestly, I am not a fan of either, as they are both heavy, costly, and subject to operator error. For ocean crossings, I think a conventional system, with proper full-length battens and slab reefing is better. The in-boom\/mast systems are fine, though, for coastal work. There is a much more detailed discussion, and lots of photos, in our Offshore Cruising Encyclopedia. Steve<\/p>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"