{"id":15,"date":"1999-11-30T00:00:00","date_gmt":"1999-11-30T05:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/?p=15"},"modified":"2015-10-16T12:09:43","modified_gmt":"2015-10-16T17:09:43","slug":"rocna-vs-bruce-anchors","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/setsail.com\/rocna-vs-bruce-anchors\/","title":{"rendered":"ROCNA vs. Bruce Anchors"},"content":{"rendered":"
Hello, How about some coments about anchors Bruce vs ROCNA for the tropics for a 68 ft wt 68,000 sailboat. What size for the ROCNA do I go with their charts or go weigh up and do we keep a large Bruce also. Thanks, Fred <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
<\/p>\n
Hi Fred: The ROCNA is a much better all around anchor. There are no hard and fast rules about sizing, except that BIGGER is always better. Lots of comments on this throughout SetSail. <\/p>\n<\/p>\n
As to your specific boat, without knowing the windage and configuration hard to say. But a Sundeer 64 Ketch went through the big hurricane a couple of years ago in Grenada with a 80kg Bruce (176 lhbs), so I would start there, using the additional holding power of the ROCNA for higher factor of safety in poor holding and the ability to anchor on very short scope. – Steve <\/p>\n
<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"