There is virtually no stability below the line indicating little wave energy is required to right the boat in a full capsize.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\nWhy don’t other ocean going motor yachts have this type of curve? There is a complex relationship between form stability from hull shape, VCG, the way weight is distributed (polar moments), where you live and work relative to the roll and pitch centers, and how this impacts comfort and cargo security. As we mentioned earlier, as you design in more beam \u00a0– which equates to form stability – the roll period shortens. The shorter the roll period, the faster and less comfortable the motion. Passenger liners and many freighters have ballast tanks up high to reduce<\/em> stability and lengthen the roll period. Of course their ultimate stability is compromised (we refer you to the lead photo in this regard), but for the ships, their odds of meeting a sea large enough to capsize them are reduced by their scale. Smaller yachts obviously do not have the scale effects working for them like the big ships and are more at risk..<\/p>\n <\/p>\n
When designing a beamy yacht, relative to a narrower configuration, for a given roll period (or comfort level), the VCG has to go up. Too low a VCG combined with extra beam means a short, uncomfortable roll period. Raising the VCG at small angles of heel has little impact, as hull form stability is dominant. But as the boat begins to heel, the VCG assumes greater importance, to the point where it is a major determinant of ultimate stability.<\/p>\n
Here are some things you can do to improve stability:<\/p>\n
\n- Keeping tanks pressed (filled). For example, if you have four fuel tanks and carrying half your fuel capacity, it is better to put the fuel in two filled tanks than four half full tanks.<\/li>\n
- Keep deck gear, dinghies, anchor rodes low.<\/li>\n
- Store heavy supplies low.<\/li>\n
- Avoid adding weight high (likes solid fly bridge tops, extra roller furling sails, and oversized rigging.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
We started using 3D CAD software back in the 1980s. The programs we ran then would take all night for one set of calculations. Today the calcs are much more sophisticated and happen in seconds. As a result, we can play “what if” games ad nauseum, working towards the optimal combination of characteristics. One of the areas we study are the shapes of the hull at various heel angles, and how we think the boat will react in a breaking sea. Lets look at some graphics showing floatation in different states for the FPB 64.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The images which follow are derived from the FPB 64 hull shape, basic house volumes, and a variety of heel angles. We are looking for:<\/p>\n
\n- Heeled stability properties.<\/li>\n
- How this configuration floats at various heel angles<\/li>\n
- Hatches and vents that are at risk from flooding.<\/li>\n
- What the heeled shape looks like relative to how it will skid, or trip, when impacted by a breaking wave crest on the beam (skidding is a highly desirable reaction).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Let’s start at 30 degrees of heel. The deck edge is clear of the water, and there are no air intakes, hatches, doors, or other items about which to worry.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Still heeled 30 degrees (above), now looking underwater at the hull and fins. The bow is barely immersed relative to the stern’s floatation \u00a0plane. There is little in this combination of hull and fins to resist skidding sideways with wave impact and with most of the resistance to skidding aft (skeg, rudder, and hull), the tendency will be for the boat to rotate on its axis bow down the wave. In our opinion the closer the bow is to heading up or down wave, and the further you are from having the waves abeam, the safer you will be.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
At 60 degrees the deck edge is immersed, but all openings are still well clear.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
The fish eye view shows the skeg and rudder still immersed, but rapidly losing their grip on the water. The windward stabilizer is clear of the water<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
90 degrees and we are just now immersing the Dorade vents, which is why they have closure plates adjustable from inside the boat.<\/span> The centerline air intake for the engine room is well clear.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Here we are completely inverted. Note that the house and just a touch of deck are required for floatation, with the deck barely immersed This means the hydrostatic pressure on the entry door and deck hatches is low. The hatches on top of the house are less than five feet\/1.5m below the waterline. Fully inverted like this the hull is highly unstable, meaning very little force is required to get the boat rolling right side up.<\/p>\n
And now an often overlooked issue, wave impact and how the energy is absorbed. If you have raced planing dinghies or catamarans you know that when the wind is puffy, and you are occasionally overpowered on a reach, pulling up the centerboard (leeward fin on a cat) allows the boat to skid sideways with the puffs, dissipating the wind energy. Modern, relatively light keelboats with high freeboard, will skid on their topsides when knocked down due to being overpowered, typically with a spinnaker flying.<\/p>\n
When a wave crest wallops your topsides it imparts energy to start the heeling process. If the boat is heavy, with a deep hull or keel, immersed surfaces and inertia of the mass, tends to hold the boat in place, allowing more energy from the wave to be transferred to the topsides. If the boat skids off to leeward with the wave impact, then the wave crest cannot impart the same force to the hull. The boat slips away from the wave, absorbing less energy over a longer period. Think of this like a boxer rolling away from a punch, taking the sting out of it as it were.\u00a0The ability to skid is a primary safety factor in dangerous seas.<\/p>\n
To recap, the key skidding elements are:<\/p>\n
\n- Heeled floatation planes which present surfaces that do not lock the hull into position.<\/li>\n
- Light displacement relative to the topside area.<\/li>\n
- Reduced vertical surface area below the waterline.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n
Do the weather and sea state risks warrant our concern with stability and capsize, especially with modern weather forecasting? The answer depends on your cruising grounds and personal tolerance for risk. We would urge the following be considered in evaluating risks:<\/p>\n