This past week we have been asked three times (by e-mail and in the marina) about the switch from sail to power, and what we thought about it now. Before answering the question some context is in order.
Prior to Wind Horse we had only twice set foot on a stinkpot, both experiences being very short. We loathed power boats, a feeling built up from years of negative interaction. Our sailing yachts, both racing cats in the olden days, and cruising designs more recently, were fast, nimble, and a joy to sail. Beowulf, the 78 foot ketch above and in subsequent photos, was the ultimate high performance cruiser, and crossing oceans aboard her was mostly a pleasure. We enjoyed sailing her agressively as a couple and the challenge of making quick, seamanlike passages, without undo risk, with just two of us aboard, was a big attraction.
And Beowulf was fast! In the photo above, taken at the start of a Caribbean 1500, she is doing 16 knots with just her two code zero jibs set. She is on her way to one of the two record setting clean sweep victories in this event (her 2001 elapsed time record still stands).
With one exception she averaged 265 miles a day, or better, on every ocean passage she made. In the trades she would easily average 300 miles a day (12.5 knots). We made the trip from Los Angeles to the Marquesas in 10.5 days (2900 miles) returning two years later from Nuka Hiva to San Diego in twelve days.
If the weather systems were stable the two of us would carry both spinnakers representing a total sail area of 6000 square feet (580 square meters). Between her stability – she carried water ballast to windward – and rig, we had to acknowledge that the boat was in charge and we were along for the ride. Sail handling had to be done carefully, in a coordinated manner, and we had to stay ahead of the weather curve. This challenge was a big part of her allure for us.
What we enjoyed most was close quarters maneuvering sans engine. Our habit was to depart from an anchorage under sail, and arrive in similar fashion. The more difficult the harbor the better. Handling 78 feet of boat with just the two of us in Falmouth Harbor, Antigua, during race week, was the ultimate buzz.
At the same time owning a yacht like Beowulf required a lot of work. When making passages, between the actual sail handling, weather analysis, routing, and navigation, there was little time or mental band width for reading or other liesure activities. And when it was time to put her into storage mode (or wake her up) it meant three days of hard work for the two of us.
Our cruising was more focused on the sailing than sitting and enjoying new surroundings. It was not unusual for us to go for a short sail within a day or two of completing a long passage, because we loved sailing. But at best 60% of our time enroute was under sail with the engine pushing us for the rest. And under sail five percent or less of the time would bring the type of weather that made for the unadulterated adrenilin rush heretofore mentioned. The balance of the time we were just grinding down the miles.
When we started thinking about what to do next after selling Beowulf the concept of switching to power was not on the radar. But when we began to take stock of our maturity, and the fact that we’d be three years closer to dotage by the time a new boat was designed and built, we realized the era of sailing high powered cruising yachts across oceans was probably over. For the two of us to continue crossing oceans alone a new design would either have to be detuned and significantly slower, or we were going to need crew. Neither option was palatable.
The thought of switching to power was not easily accepted. Even after the design was completed, and we were close to launching, both of us, and in particular Steve, had second thoughts. The idea of a powerboat was still an anathema to us even as Wind Horse was being launched. While Linda was fine with the concept of passaging sans adrenilin, Steve was not so sure. However, he had his glider and the pursuit of soaring records to fall back on for the adrenaline fix.
It did not take long during our sea trials during the New Zealand winter to appreciate some of Wind Horse’s benefits. Wet, cold day? No problem. We ran the boat from the warm, dry, great room, with 360 degree views. Anchoring could be done from inside, so it was only coming and going from the dock that we were exposed to the elements. We often had cruising friends aboard for our “day sails” and chatting while running the boat – whether inside or on the flying bridge – was as enjoyable as if we were sailing.
Still, it wasn’t until the first long passage to Fiji that we really started to accept our transition from sailing. That passage indelibly stamped Wind Horse’s advantages on our physches.
It is now five years and many thousands of miles later and there have been a few surprises comparing the FPB 83 Wind Horse and 78 foot ketch Beowulf.
- Wind Horse is far more comfortable than Beowulf on all points of sail and in all sea states.
- She is so much easier to handle, there is little to do underway besides navigate and check the engine room. Passages remain pleasurable and definitely not boring.
- Cost has averaged a third less per mile to cruise under power than was the case under sail.
- We are cruising in wonderful regions we’d never consider under sail.
wildlife
- From polar bears to leaping whales, we are seeing far more than before.
- After 45,000+ miles in five years we are convinced if we have to be caught in severe weather we’d much rather be aboard Wind Horse than Beowulf.
- Day to day maintenance with Wind Horse is a fraction of what was needed with Beowulf.
- Because there is so little (if any) difference in comfort between being at sea and at anchor distance to a destination is rarely a consideration in planning where to go.
- We are spending substantially more time afloat than was the case before, and covering a lot more territory.
Are we surprised by the outcome? Yes, and we are not complaining. We are still uneasy with the self-image of being on a powerboat, and when we share an anchorage with a bunch of sailors, there is no denying a tinge of embarassment with the concept. But knowing what we do today, if it were ten or even 20 years ago, and we had the choice of either Beowulf or Wind Horse for cruising, we’d choose Wind Horse.
As a vehicle with which to explore and lead a cruising lifestyle, she is simply a better tool, both for getting us across the ocean and exploring once we have arrived at a new destination.
Consider our travels the past five years of part time use:
- 2005: Fiji, Samoa, Hawaii, California.
- 2006: California, Alaska, and return.
- 2007: California, Mexico, Prince William Sound (Alaska), and return.
- 2008: California, Panama, Bahamas, Nova Scotia, Newfoundland, Labrador, Greenland, Ireland, UK.
- 2009: UK, Norway, Svalbard to 80 degrees north, Shetland Islands, Scotland, UK.
- 2010: UK, Spain, Portugal, eventually returning to the East Coast of the US.
As much as we love sailing and in particular Beowulf, we would not have gone to the more difficult destinations nor traveled the miles to get to them under sail. The combination of discomfort (or effort if you prefer) and enhanced risk factors when sailing kept us mainly to the benign cruising regions. Wind Horse has opened a new world of voyaging experiences to us without our having to pay the usual penalties associated therewith.
Which leads us back to the adrenalin rush or lack thereof when passaging with our FPB. To begin with, neither of us miss the “excitement” of passaging under sail. We are actually enjoying ocean crossing more now than when we sailed. True, there is not the same feeling of accomplishment that comes from the two of us making a fast passage by ourselves. But there is still pleasure in the rhythm of a yacht at sea and we find this enhaced when we subtract the awareness and total concentration required under sail.
For Steve there has been an unexpected change in his flying habits. Whereas with sailboats in our lives he was flying 200 or more hours a year in the pursuit of records (a lot of cockpit time in a glider), the switch to power brought a precipitous drop in the hours aloft. As soaring was an important part of the calculus in switching from sail to power this is one of the biggest surprises.
Not that either of us have given up on the need for external sensory stimulation. Now it comes from the exquisite beauty of locations like Prince William Sound in Alaska,
Greenland’s Disco Bay,
or the Svalbard Islands in the high Arctic.
Do we miss sailing? Parts, certainly. But Wind Horse gives us so many more pleasurable options that she is covering far more miles than was ever the case with our sailboats, and allowing us to do so at a time in life when most folks our age are sitting on land thinking about the good old days.
Additional References:
There are a variety of videos of passaging on Beowulf and Wind Horse available on line. An interesting comparison may be the 12 day passage aboard Beowulf from the Marquesas Islands back to San Diego here, and then a similar length trip on Wind Horse from LA to Panama here.
Three articles on the Dashew Offshore website may also shed light on this subject. These are “Living with 360 degree views“, “A different perspective“, and “Our own time machine“.
August 16th, 2010 at 5:46 pm
Hello Steve & Linda
I read this with a lot of mixed emotions stemming from the contrast of sailing to motoring and the thought that I will one day need to make the same decision
After many years of yacht racing including races like the Sydney to Hobart, I have decided that the sheer effort of campaigning a race boat (organizing crew etc) is not returning the fun that it did. So I am making the transition to cruising.
I have been an avid reader of all of your material for many years and certainly drooled when reading your Beowulf posts.
I see the practicality of all of your comments in this post but still it is hard to let go of the concept of a cruising yacht.
May I ask you how old you were when you made the decision to sell Beowulf?
Also, it it would be a great follow on post to this one if you could give us a comparison budget for (say) a year showing where Wind Horse picks up the one third saving in running costs over Beowulf… I am sure a lot of readers would be interested in knowing that as the general thinking for most people is that the wind is free so motoring is expensive
Thank you for the many years of interesting and valuable information and insights
Regards
Warren
August 17th, 2010 at 10:45 am
Hi Warren:
It was early in our sixth decade when we sold Beowulf. Re the cost comparison, that is a good suggestion for a post, and we’ll work on one over the next few days.
August 17th, 2010 at 9:31 am
Steve,
You think Lynn and Larry would agree about the cost side of it?
Phil
August 17th, 2010 at 11:02 am
Our guess is that the cost trade off starts to favor an FPB style power boat at around 55 feet. As you grow in size the favorables improve. Now, if you have a fuel hog, the equation is going to be quite different.
Re the Pardeys, without Larry’s considerably boat building skills their style of cruising yacht would be very costly to own.
August 17th, 2010 at 11:26 am
We sailed across the Indian ocean last year and with using big solar panels for charging, I think we used 7 gallons of diesel. Careful inspection and chafe patches in the right places, no material wear on the sails or sheets (Frers design Nautor’s Swan 48, so near your 55ft sweet spot).
I’m having a hard time justifying that a 55 ft sailboat “rigging cost” is the break even between that and a 80ft power boat?
If you have a yacht that can sail in lighter winds, it MUST change your cost analysis?
August 17th, 2010 at 12:10 pm
Don’t want to get into a debate with you Phil, but if you consider the cost of replacing your sail inventory after X miles or sun hours, running rigging maintenance and replacement, standing rigging inspection and periodic replacement, rig hydraulic maintenance, pulling the rig once in a while to inspect it, not to mention the odd trip to the sailmaker, the cost per mile will add up. If you have a halfway decent prop, I will bet it is much cheaper for you to power at an efficient speed than to sail in light airs when where and tear and UV is considered on sails and rig.
We figured on the 62 foot Intermezzo ll it was half or less the cost per mile to power compared to sailing, and that was with Dacron sails (high modulus fabrics are obviously more costly).
If you are willing to do the maintenance yourself, and stretch the life of the elements, accepting the risks that go with this approach, then the equation changes somewhat. But as the boats get larger the problems associated with deferred maintenance compound, and become more difficult to handle.
We nursed a very tired rig and sail inventory across the Indian Ocean a long time ago. We could do this with a slender lightly loaded 50 footer. Not with a modern 55 or 60 footer.
August 19th, 2010 at 7:32 am
Hello Steve and Linda,
A very thought provoking blog entry. I am a Nordhavn 40 owner so don’t need convincing to change to a stinkpot! As an avid reader of your blog and books (and a Rocna anchor owner based on your thoughts!) I was delighted to return to my slip yesterday (18th Aug) and find Wind Horse about 30 meters along the pontoon. I could see that you were aboard but didn’t disturb you as I’m sure you have an endless stream of nosey neighbours!
Wind Horse looks even more impressive than the photos. May I wish you many years of safe cruising and thank you for your ability and willingness to share your knowledge.
Best wishes,
Colin
August 20th, 2010 at 1:16 am
Thanks Colin:
We are in Gibraltar for another day or two. If you are around, please stop by.
August 21st, 2010 at 1:20 am
Hi Steve-
I very much enjoy reading about your travels, adventures and designs. By the number of responses to this post you seem to have touched off the classic argument between sail and power. As an avid west coast sailor and a one day voyager I find myself drawn to both.
I remember a discussion that I had with one of my first sailing instructors. He suggested that the reason that choosing to travel the world via the sea is so appealing is that it taps into both the left and right sides of our mind. On the left is the logical – the navigation, the machinery, the analytical, the physics, and the science of weather. On the right is the subjective – the art, the beauty, the sport and the challenge of venturing out into the sea. It is the right side of our brain that gives us that tingle when one sees a classic schooner glide by under full sail in perfect conditions.
Voyaging and selecting the proper vessel to accomplish your mission forces one to choose. I believe that voyaging by power is far and away more practical and the voyages that you have accomplished on Windhorse seem to make this case. If I were forced to choose at this moment I would have to choose power….but then again the forecast this weekend lookes like it would be perfect for sailing….hmmm.
Thanks again for sharing your adventures with us.
August 21st, 2010 at 7:26 am
Hi Steve & Linda,
We met John & Nickel in the Bahamas and and appreciate their website with usefull information especially their mention of your choice of anti fouling paint system.Since may we bought a Hutting 40, an aluminium hull, and are ready to apply 15 mills of Amercoat 235 barrier coat plus ABC 4 anti fouling paint.The underneath epoxy coating on the boat is already 12 mills.Are you plenty satisfied with your choice and do you still recommend the system for an aluminium hull?We hope to make a good decision with our first aluminium hull!! We used Devoe systems on a previous dutch sailboat and were entirely pleased by their quality products.
Regards,
Yves & Elaine S\V Velvet
August 22nd, 2010 at 10:35 am
Hello Yves:
Our barrier paint system and antifouling are still working fine. However, if you are switching suppliers be sure to check with the tech rep about comparability and if a tie coat is required between old and new systems.
November 30th, 2011 at 10:31 am
Hi Steve and Linda,
what is the reason that…at best 60% of your time enroute was under sail (Beowulf) with the engine pushing you for the rest…?
Was it lack of wind, disappointing upwind performance, in a hurry ?
I am a big fan of your designs, your website and stories.
with kind regards, Martin Jan Visser, the Netherlands
November 30th, 2011 at 9:07 pm
Hi Martin:
Our approach to crossing oceans has always been to turn on the engine below a certain minimum speed. This was to save wear on the rig, it being much harder on sails and hardware in light airs then when pressed by the wind, and to reduce weather risks. With Beowulf the minimum speed typically occurred in eight knots or less wind speed, when boat speed dropped below ten knots. The cost of using the engine compared to sailing in these conditions was on the order of half.